법률사무소 세금과 법률 taxnlaw.co.kr
ID PW
TAX & LAW 세금과 법률
[한국변호사, 미국변호사(연방법원, 일리노이주), 세무사 이재욱]
조세소송, 조세불복심판, 세무자문, 민,형사,행정,국제소송, 한국이민, 미국이민, 한국투자, 미국투자, 국제거래, 국제중재, 미술품거래 서비스
[ENGLISH LANGUAGE SERVICE FOR FOREIGNERS]
ATTORNEY LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE [ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
TAX, LAW, IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT INTO KOREA AND U.S.A. SERVICES, ART DEALING SERVICES
[INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT, DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, CRIMINAL TRIAL, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, VISA, RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
세무신고,불복심판,조세소송 전문서비스 -> BLOG[ 세금과 법률 그룹(변호사 이재욱) 세무소송,조세소송]
고품격 이혼,상속분쟁, 재산권분쟁 소송 -> BLOG[ 이혼소송, 재산분할, 상속분쟁, 양육권, 친권, 위자료]
성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문서비스 -> BLOG[ 성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문변호사]
병역면제,국외여행허가,이중국적,병역법위반 사건 대리 -> BLOG[ 병역법, 병역면제, 해외유학 병역연기 전문소송 변호사 이재욱(한국변호사, 미국변호사, IL, FEDERAL)]
KOREA IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT SERVICES IN KOREA FOR FOREIGNERS -> BLOG[ Korea Visa & Immigration, Investment, Sojourn for Foreigners]
한국인을 위한 미국이민 대리서비스 -> BLOG[ Immigration to U.S.A. for KOREANS (한국인을 위한 미국 이민 대리 서비스)]
변호사 이재욱 저서 구매 사이트(TAX & LAW PRESS) -> 예스24 온라인판매

TAXNLAW.CO.KR

About Attorney| 민사
행정
| 세무
조세
| 부동산| 병역법위반소송
기소중지
병역면제
국외여행허가
| KOREA
INVESTMENT
VISA
Immigration
| 이혼
성희롱
성폭력
전문강사
| 예술과
법률
| U.S.A.
VISA
IMMIGRATION
| 파산
회생
| OFFICE| U.S.A.
VISA
APPLICATION
| Refuge
Asylum
| 미국법|
미국 이민,비자,영주권
미국이민뉴스
PRACTITION TIP
USCIS AFM(DHS)
9 FAM VISAS(DOS)
PERM (Labor Certification)
Consular Process(DOS)
DACA, DAPA
VAWA
legal english
AAO불복
연방법원항소
Immigration Court 항소
BIA항소
ICE 이민집행
CBP 세관 및 입출국관리
Removal 추방
PT
미국이민뉴스


Case: Lee v. United States (No. 16-327)
jae wook LEE  (Homepage)
2017-01-29 10:34:09, 조회 : 287, 추천 : 74
Dear Immigration Committee Members:
  
Our partners at Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC are filing a merits-stage amicus brief in the upcoming Supreme Court case, Lee v. United States, to advocate for immigrant families and communities and emphasize the harms of deportation.  As the brief is focused on sharing some stories, they would like you to contact them with any stories you may have for inclusion.
  
NAPABA joined AAJC at the cert stage in this case and will be joining them on the attached draft brief.
  
They need the stories ASAP as they must have the final copy on Wednesday, Feb. 1. Please contact them directly at amicus@advancingjustice-aajc.org if you have any suggestions.
  
Case:               Lee v. United States (No. 16-327)
  
What’s at Stake for Immigrant Families?
  
This case is about the harsh penalty that immigrant families faces when family members encounter the criminal justice system. Under current immigration laws, a conviction for even a minor non-violent offense, like simple drug possession, can subject non-citizens, including lawful permanent residents that have lived in the U.S. for decades, to mandatory deportation.
  
The consequences are devastating. As a result of a conviction that may lead only to probation or a suspended sentence, lawful immigrants can face permanent banishment from the U.S. and be sent to countries where they have no family, do not speak the language, and are at continuing risk of impoverishment, persecution, or death. Recognizing the life-altering cost to defendants and their families, the Supreme Court has mandated warnings before a non-citizen defendant pleads guilty to an offense that qualifies for automatic deportation.
  
The constitutional right to a warning is ineffective, however, unless defendants have access to a meaningful remedy that accounts for the full harms of deportation. Mr. Lee’s case illustrates the unfairness in ignoring those harms. After living in the U.S. lawfully for over 25 years, Mr. Lee pleaded guilty to possession of ecstasy. He told his attorney that he wanted to avoid deportation, and only agreed to a plea after his attorney advised (incorrectly) that he would not be deported to Korea. Despite the Sixth Circuit’s recognition that justice was not served by “exil[ing] a productive member of our society to a country he hasn’t lived in since his childhood for committing a relatively small-time drug offense,” the court found no prejudice and declined to grant Mr. Lee a remedy for his counsel’s ineffective assistance. The court concluded that it was irrational for Mr. Lee to demand a trial, since the evidence against him was allegedly strong.
  
It is critical that the Supreme Court confirm that a remedy is available to Mr. Lee and others confronting the same dilemma. For many defendants and their families, it is rational to risk a longer sentence by going to trial, rather than accept a plea that will lead to certain deportation. Focusing only on alleged proof of guilt—while ignoring the strength of family ties and other connections to the U.S.—improperly ignores the devastating humanitarian harms of deportation, and eliminates one of the only tools available to immigrant families to keep their families together—the right to insist on a trial when a family member faces mandatory removal from the U.S.
  
Summary of Planned Amicus Brief:
  
Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC and pro bono counsel from Wilmer Hale are drafting an amicus brief for immigrants’ rights groups supporting Mr. Lee. The brief focuses on explaining why non-citizen defendants and their families are entitled to a remedy for mistaken pleas that accounts for the harms of deportation in all cases.  The brief will:

Tell the stories of other defendants in Mr. Lee’s position and explain why they would rationally elect to go to trial;
Explain the harsh circumstances that defendants experience following deportation to their country of origin and the resulting harms on family members left behind in the U.S.; and
Highlight how U.S. immigration policy has long recognized the importance of family unity and point out that the same legal principle should apply in assessing whether defendants are prejudiced by mistaken pleas that permanently separate them from family members.
Your Immigration Committee Co-Chairs




http://taxnlaw.co.kr/

  추천하기   [HOME]  [bitly]  [반전해제]  목록보기

Copyright 1999-2018 Zeroboard / skin by zero
일부 항목은 회원가입후 login하셔야 글을 읽고 쓰실 수 있습니다.
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.

세금과 법률
세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)
변호사 이재욱(한국, 미국)
우)06653
서울특별시 서초구 서초동 1589-5 센츄리1 오피스텔 412호
서울특별시 서초구 반포대로14길 30 (센츄리오피스텔) 412호.
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653

email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
연락전화: +82-010-6350-1799 / 미국전화: +1-323-553-1799

세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민
(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)

TAX & LAW, ART DEALING, IMMIGRATION
ATTORNEY AT LAW(KOREA, USA, ILLINOIS)
KOREA CELL: +82-010-6350-1799 / U.S.A., CELL: +1-323-553-1799
email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
우)06653
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653