Tax & Law (세금과 법률) 변호사(Korea, U.S.A. IL.) 이재욱 taxnlaw.co.kr
ID PW
[TAX & LAW] 변호사 이재욱

Attorney(KOREA, U.S.A., IL.)
LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE
→   →
Attorney LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE
[ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
[개인과 기업을 위한 모든 법률문제를 서비스합니다.]
1997년부터 20년이상의 노하우를 가지고 웬만한 개인과 기업이 평생에 걸쳐 경험할 수 있는 거의 대부분의 민사,형사,행정,조세,국제거래,국제계약,이민,탄원,진정,고소,고발,제안,협상,중재,조정,업무대행,대리 사건의 자문과 소송과 계획안 제출대리 업무을 경험하고 처리해 왔습니다. 국내거래나 국제거래를 비롯하여 개인과 기업이 당면한 어떤 문제도 모두 해결해 드립니다. 주저하지 마시고 사무실을 내방하여 이재욱변호사의 축적된 경험과 학식과 지식을 이용하여 상담부터 받으세요. 본 사무실에서 해결해드리지 못할 경우 다른 해결방안을 제시해드립니다.
[FOR FOREIGNERS - ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEGAL SERVICES in Counseling, Application and LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS and TRIBUNALS in KOREA]
INTERNATIONAL DIVORCE, CIVIL, REAL ESTATE, PERSONAL INJURY, DAMAGES, TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, FRAUD, PENAL LAW, CRIMINAL TRIAL, FELONY, GUILTY PLEA, LEASE, RENTAL LAW, IMMIGRATION, INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT, DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, REMOVAL, VISA, PERMANENT RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
상담료
선임료
변호사소개
사무실위치
| 민사
성폭력
이혼
형사재판
| 세무
조세
행정
주식분쟁
| 병역법
기소중지
병역면제
국외여행허가
| KOREA
INVEST
VISA
REFUGEE
| 미국이민
영주권
시민권
부동산취득
| . |
↓   Immigration Court 항소
↓   Immigration Court 항소


Overview of Immigration Court Process
관리자  (Homepage)
2015-07-16 14:40:55, 조회 : 501, 추천 : 144
Immigration Court

The U.S. Immigration Courts have jurisdiction to conduct removal proceedings – the process by which the U.S. government attempts to remove an allegedly deportable foreign national. Immigration Courts also preside over bond hearings, asylum-only proceedings, and rescission hearings.

Removal proceedings are initiated by the filing of a Notice to Appear (“NTA”) with the Immigration Court. The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) files the NTA with the Immigration Court that has jurisdiction over where the NTA is issued. Venue of the proceedings will lie where the NTA is filed.

Once the NTA is filed with the appropriate Immigration Court, the individual – the respondent – will be scheduled for a first appearance before an Immigration Judge, which is called a Master Hearing. At the Master Hearing:

The respondent is notified of the charges of removal against him/her;
The respondent will be asked to concede proper service of the NTA;
The respondent will be asked to enter pleadings to the charges against him/her;
The respondent will be asked to designate a country of removal in the event that it becomes necessary; and
The respondent can designate any form(s) of relief from removal that s/he will be seeking.
If the respondent appears for his/her first Master Hearing without an attorney, s/he shall be given time to retain the services of an attorney if desired. Respondents in removal proceedings have the right to represented by counsel of their choosing, however, they are not entitled to an attorney at the expense of the government.

Once the respondent designates the relief from removal that s/he will be seeking, the Immigration Judge will schedule an Individual Hearing (trial). At the Individual Hearing, the respondent is provided with the opportunity to present evidence in support of his/her application for admission and to call witnesses on his/her behalf. The respondent also has the right to cross-examine any witnesses against him/her.

At the end of the Individual Hearing, the Immigration Judge will render a decision. The respondent and the government will have the right to reserve appeal if they do not agree with the judge’s decision.



Board of Immigration Appeals

A decision of an Immigration Judge can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA can review decisions on the merits and also bond decisions.

A party that seeks to appeal an Immigration Court decision must file a Notice of Appeal with the BIA within 30 days of the Immigration Judge’s decision. The BIA will then order the transcript of the Immigration Court proceedings, which is then provided to the government and the respondent. The BIA then sets due dates for the respondent’s and the government’s briefs on appeal. Once both parties have filed appeal briefs, the BIA will consider the case and render a decision, which can take several months and even over one (1) year in some cases.



Bond Proceedings

Foreign nationals charged with removal are subject to detention by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) are eligible for release on bond except those subject to mandatory detention of those who can be classified as “arriving aliens” under the INA. Bond is initially set by the DHS.

The DHS should normally set bond unless it is determined that the individual is a threat to national security, likely to abscond, or a poor bail risk.

After the DHS sets the initial bond, the detained individual may make an application for bond redetermination to an Immigration Judge. A bond hearing may be requested orally or in writing. At the bond hearing, the Immigration Judge may set, lower, or raise bond.



Mandatory Detention

Under the INA, certain classes of foreign nationals subject to removal must be detained and are not eligible for bond. These individuals subject to mandatory detention include:

Anyone inadmissible on criminal grounds;
Anyone deportable based upon commission of two (2) or more CIMTs;
Anyone deportable based upon a conviction of an aggravated felony;
Anyone convicted of a drug offense, a firearm offense, espionage, sabotage, or treason;
Anyone convicted of a CIMT for which the sentence of imprisonment is at least one (1) year; and
Persons involved in terrorist activity.


Arriving Aliens

Arriving alien are also subject to mandatory detention. An “arriving alien” is an applicant for admission coming or attempting to come to the U.S. at a port of entry. While an arriving alien is not eligible for bond, these individuals are eligible for release from custody on parole. A request for parole is made to the DHS. The factors to be considered when determining whether to grant a parole request include:

Seriousness of the offense;
Prior criminal history;
Any sentence imposed and any time served;
History of failures to appear;
Probationary history;
Evidence of rehabilitation effort or recidivism;
Equities in the U.S.;
Availability of relief and likelihood it would be granted; and
Prior immigration violations and history.





* 관리자님에 의해서 게시물 이동되었습니다 (2016-05-05 13:30)


http://taxnlaw.co.kr/

  추천하기   [HOME]  [bitly]  [반전해제]  목록보기

Copyright 1999-2019 Zeroboard / skin by zero
일부 항목은 회원가입후 login하셔야 글을 읽고 쓰실 수 있습니다.
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.