Attorney LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE
[ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
[개인과 기업을 위한 모든 법률문제를 서비스합니다.]
1997년부터 20년이상의 노하우를 가지고 웬만한 개인과 기업이 평생에 걸쳐 경험할 수 있는 거의 대부분의 민사,형사,행정,조세,국제거래,국제계약,이민,탄원,진정,고소,고발,제안,협상,중재,조정,업무대행,대리 사건의 자문과 소송과 계획안 제출대리 업무을 경험하고 처리해 왔습니다. 국내거래나 국제거래를 비롯하여 개인과 기업이 당면한 어떤 문제도 모두 해결해 드립니다.
주저하지 마시고 사무실을 내방하여 이재욱변호사의 축적된 경험과 학식과 지식을 이용하여 상담부터 받으세요. 본 사무실에서 해결해드리지 못할 경우 다른 해결방안을 제시해드립니다.
[FOR FOREIGNERS - ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEGAL SERVICES in Counseling, Application and LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS and TRIBUNALS in KOREA]
INTERNATIONAL DIVORCE, CIVIL, REAL ESTATE, PERSONAL INJURY, DAMAGES, TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, FRAUD, PENAL LAW, CRIMINAL TRIAL, FELONY, GUILTY PLEA, LEASE, RENTAL LAW, IMMIGRATION, INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT,
DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, REMOVAL, VISA, PERMANENT RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
During the May 15, 2015 AILA liaison meeting
a) with the National Benefits Center (NBC),
NBC officials stated that
a) they issue more Requests for Evidence (RFEs)
i) in connection with Form I-864,
A) Affidavit of Support,
ii) than they do
A) for any other product line.
The NBC confirmed that
a) contract employees perform the initial screening
i) of Form I-864
ii) based on a set of checklist criteria.
While the use
a) of contractors
may be necessary
a) for overall process efficiency,
1) anecdotal reports
a) from AILA members
a) the issuance
i) of erroneous I-864 RFEs
are not uncommon.
The AILA NBC Liaison Committee continues to raise this issue
a) with the NBC
b) in an effort to stop the issuance
i) of these unnecessary RFEs.
In the meantime,
this practice pointer provides tips
a) for dealing with one of the more common issues.
Although the NBC did not provide a copy of the contractor checklist,
1) it appears that
a) RFEs are often issued
b) where the total income
i) for the most recent tax year
ii) listed in Part 6,
A) Item 19
I) of Form I-864
is less than the federal poverty guidelines
i) based on the sponsor’s household size.
These RFEs request
a) evidence of assets
i) to make up the perceived shortage
A) of income or
b) an I-864
i) from a joint sponsor.
a) the regulations and
b) USCIS guidance
1) are clear that
a) the focus should be on the sponsor’s current income,
i) not income
A) as reported on the federal tax return
I) for the most recent tax year.
When an RFE is issued
a) in connection with the Affidavit of Support,
1) interim benefits
a) such as
i) employment authorization and
ii) advance parole
2) until an adequate RFE response is submitted to the NBC.
In order to avoid such delays,
1) practitioners should keep the following points in mind:
a. While the initial Form I-864 is screened
i) at the NBC
ii) by contractors,
1) the RFE response is reviewed
A) by a USCIS officer.
The NBC clearly stated
A) at the May 15, 2015 liaison meeting
B) that it will not forward a case
I) to the local office
C) if it believes that
I) the I-864 is inadequate
(a) following an RFE response.0F
In such cases,
the NBC will deny the Form I-485
A) due to the insufficiency of the RFE response.
b. In an effort
i) to avoid an RFE
A) in situations
I) where the total income
(a) for the most recent tax year
(i) listed in Part 6, Item 19
(A) of the Form I-864
(a) than the federal poverty guidelines,
1) include documentation
A) to substantiate the sponsor’s current household income
I) (as listed in Part 6,
(a) Item 2 and
(b) Item 15
(i) of the I-864).
Although such documentation is not required initial evidence,
1) it may assist the NBC contractor
A) in determining
I) that the I-864 is in fact sufficient.1
c. When responding to an RFE
i) that you believe is incorrect,
1) make your strongest legal arguments
A) as to why you believe your initial I-864 was adequate.
1. Note that the NBC approach is different than the National Visa Center (NVC) approach where the NVC will forward Form I-864 to the consulate following the issuance of an I-864 checklist letter and response.
You should also be prepared
A) to submit the documentation requested,
I) which would be either
(a) evidence of the sponsor’s assets
(i) to cover any perceived shortage
(A) in income or
(b) an I-864
(i) completed by a joint sponsor.
Consider including language
A) directing the USCIS adjudicator
I) to consider the joint sponsor’s I-864
(a) only as an alternative
1) should the adjudicator still deem
A) the I-864 and
B) supporting documentation
II) after review of the RFE response.
You should renew this request
A) with the local USCIS adjudicator
B) at the time
I) of the adjustment of status interview.
d. Prepare yourself and your clients
i) for the possibility of an RFE
1) where the total income
A) for the most recent tax year
I) listed in Part 6, Item 19 of the Form I-864
is less than the federal poverty guidelines
A) based on the sponsor’s household size, and
2) where there may be a legal argument
A) as to how or why the sponsor’s income is adequate
B) (for example,
I) where assets are being used
(a) for overcoming an income shortage or
II) where non-traditional sources
(a) of income
are being used
(a) to demonstrate the sponsor’s current income).