법률사무소 세금과 법률 taxnlaw.co.kr
ID PW
TAX & LAW <세금과 법률> 당신과 당신의 소중한 가족을 지켜드립니다. Attorney LEE protects your family, not only you
[한국변호사, 미국변호사(연방법원, 일리노이주), 세무사 이재욱]
조세소송, 조세불복심판, 세무자문, 민,형사,행정,국제소송, 한국이민, 미국이민, 한국투자, 미국투자, 국제거래, 국제중재, 미술품거래 서비스
[ENGLISH LANGUAGE SERVICE FOR FOREIGNERS]
ATTORNEY LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE [ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
TAX, LAW, IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT INTO KOREA AND U.S.A. SERVICES, ART DEALING SERVICES
[INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT, DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, CRIMINAL TRIAL, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, VISA, RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
국제거래,국제계약, 영문계약서, 중재,조정,ADR, Arbitration Court representation. Singapore, HK, LONDON, NY. BEIJing, LA -> BLOG[국제중재,국제재판,국제중재재판,국제거래,국제계약,국제조정, Korea Arbitrator LEE, jae wook Attorney at law(KOREA, U.S.A.)]
학교폭력,학생폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교성폭력, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 전문서비스 -> BLOG[학교폭력, 학생폭력,학교 성폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 서비스]
세무신고,불복심판,조세소송 전문서비스 -> BLOG[세무소송,조세소송]
고품격 이혼,상속분쟁, 재산권분쟁 소송 -> BLOG[ 이혼소송, 재산분할, 상속분쟁, 양육권, 친권, 위자료]
성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문서비스 -> BLOG[ 성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문변호사]
병역면제,국외여행허가,이중국적,병역법위반 사건 대리 -> BLOG[ 병역법, 병역면제, 해외유학 병역연기 전문소송 변호사 이재욱(한국변호사, 미국변호사, IL, FEDERAL)]
KOREA IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT SERVICES IN KOREA FOR FOREIGNERS -> BLOG[ Korea Visa & Immigration, Investment, Sojourn for Foreigners]
한국인을 위한 미국이민 대리서비스 -> BLOG[ Immigration to U.S.A. for KOREANS (한국인을 위한 미국 이민 대리 서비스)]
변호사 이재욱 저서 구매 사이트(TAX & LAW PRESS) -> 예스24 온라인판매

TAXNLAW.CO.KR

About Attorney| 민사
행정
| 세무
조세
| 부동산| 병역법위반소송
기소중지
병역면제
국외여행허가
| KOREA
INVESTMENT
VISA
Immigration
| 이혼
성희롱
성폭력
전문강사
| 예술과
법률
| U.S.A.
VISA
IMMIGRATION
| 파산
회생
| OFFICE| U.S.A.
VISA
APPLICATION
| Refuge
Asylum
| 미국법|
C VISA
E1, E2
F visa
H visa
J visa
K visa
L visa
O, P visa
R visa
S visa
T, U visa
V visa
WAIVER(추방,입국불허면제)
체류기간연장(NIV EOS)
비이민비자 신분변경(NIV COS)
inadmissibility 입국불허사유
deportability 추방사유
조건해제(Removal of condition)
EB2, NIW(국익면제)
고용이민
가족이민
영주권 신분변경(AOS)
투자이민(EB-5)
LPR TRAVEL 영주권자 해외여행
가족이민


Dealing with Form I-864 Requests for Evidence
jae wook LEE  (Homepage)
2016-06-28 12:13:47, 조회 : 375, 추천 : 104




Dealing with Form I-864 Requests for Evidence


During the May 15, 2015 AILA liaison meeting
a) with the National Benefits Center (NBC),

NBC officials stated that
a) they issue more Requests for Evidence (RFEs)
i) in connection with Form I-864,
A) Affidavit of Support,
ii) than they do
A) for any other product line.

The NBC confirmed that
a) contract employees perform the initial screening
i) of Form I-864
ii) based on a set of checklist criteria.

While the use
a) of contractors

  may be necessary
a) for overall process efficiency,

1) anecdotal reports
a) from AILA members

  indicate that
a) the issuance
i) of erroneous I-864 RFEs

  are not uncommon.

The AILA NBC Liaison Committee continues to raise this issue
        a) with the NBC
        b) in an effort to stop the issuance
                i) of these unnecessary RFEs.

In the meantime,

this practice pointer provides tips
        a) for dealing with one of the more common issues.

Although the NBC did not provide a copy of the contractor checklist,

1) it appears that
        a) RFEs are often issued
        b) where the total income
                i) for the most recent tax year
                ii) listed in Part 6,
                        A) Item 19
                                I) of Form I-864

            is less than the federal poverty guidelines
                i) based on the sponsor’s household size.





These RFEs request
        a) evidence of assets
                i) to make up the perceived shortage
                        A) of income or
        b) an I-864
                i) from a joint sponsor.


However,

        a) the regulations and
        b) USCIS guidance

1) are clear that
        a) the focus should be on the sponsor’s current income,
                i) not income
                        A) as reported on the federal tax return
                                I) for the most recent tax year.

When an RFE is issued
        a) in connection with the Affidavit of Support,

1) interim benefits
        a) such as
                i) employment authorization and
                ii) advance parole

    are delayed
2) until an adequate RFE response is submitted to the NBC.

In order to avoid such delays,

1) practitioners should keep the following points in mind:

        a. While the initial Form I-864 is screened
                i) at the NBC
                ii) by contractors,

                1) the RFE response is reviewed
                        A) by a USCIS officer.

                The NBC clearly stated
                        A) at the May 15, 2015 liaison meeting
                        B) that it will not forward a case
                                I) to the local office
                        C) if it believes that
                                I) the I-864 is inadequate
                                        (a) following an RFE response.0F


                In such cases,

                the NBC will deny the Form I-485
                        A) due to the insufficiency of the RFE response.

        b. In an effort
                i) to avoid an RFE
                        A) in situations
                                I) where the total income
                                        (a) for the most recent tax year
                                                (i) listed in Part 6, Item 19
                                                        (A) of the Form I-864

                                    is less
                                        (a) than the federal poverty guidelines,

                1) include documentation
                        A) to substantiate the sponsor’s current household income
                                I) (as listed in Part 6,
                                        (a) Item 2 and
                                        (b) Item 15
                                                (i) of the I-864).





                Although such documentation is not required initial evidence,

                1) it may assist the NBC contractor
                        A) in determining
                                I) that the I-864 is in fact sufficient.1


        c. When responding to an RFE
                i) that you believe is incorrect,

                1) make your strongest legal arguments
                        A) as to why you believe your initial I-864 was adequate.



1. Note that the NBC approach is different than the National Visa Center (NVC) approach where the NVC will forward Form I-864 to the consulate following the issuance of an I-864 checklist letter and response.


                You should also be prepared
                        A) to submit the documentation requested,
                                I) which would be either
                                        (a) evidence of the sponsor’s assets
                                                (i) to cover any perceived shortage
                                                        (A) in income or
                                        (b) an I-864
                                                (i) completed by a joint sponsor.

                Consider including language
                        A) directing the USCIS adjudicator
                                I) to consider the joint sponsor’s I-864
                                        (a) only as an alternative
                                        
                1) should the adjudicator still deem
                        A) the I-864 and
                        B) supporting documentation
                                I) insufficient
                                II) after review of the RFE response.

                You should renew this request
                        A) with the local USCIS adjudicator
                        B) at the time
                                I) of the adjustment of status interview.

        d. Prepare yourself and your clients
                i) for the possibility of an RFE

                1) where the total income
                        A) for the most recent tax year
                                I) listed in Part 6, Item 19 of the Form I-864

                    is less than the federal poverty guidelines
                        A) based on the sponsor’s household size, and
                2) where there may be a legal argument
                        A) as to how or why the sponsor’s income is adequate
                        B) (for example,
                                I) where assets are being used
                                        (a) for overcoming an income shortage or
                                II) where non-traditional sources
                                        (a) of income

                                    are being used
                                        (a) to demonstrate the sponsor’s current income).


http://taxnlaw.co.kr/

  추천하기   [HOME]  [bitly]  [반전해제]  목록보기

Copyright 1999-2018 Zeroboard / skin by zero
일부 항목은 회원가입후 login하셔야 글을 읽고 쓰실 수 있습니다.
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.

세금과 법률
세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)
변호사 이재욱(한국, 미국)
우)06653
서울특별시 서초구 서초동 1589-5 센츄리1 오피스텔 412호
서울특별시 서초구 반포대로14길 30 (센츄리오피스텔) 412호.
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653

email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
연락전화: +82-010-6350-1799 / 미국전화: +1-323-553-1799

세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민
(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)

TAX & LAW, ART DEALING, IMMIGRATION
ATTORNEY AT LAW(KOREA, USA, ILLINOIS)
KOREA CELL: +82-010-6350-1799 / U.S.A., CELL: +1-323-553-1799
email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
우)06653
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653