법률사무소 세금과 법률 taxnlaw.co.kr
ID PW
TAX & LAW <세금과 법률> 당신과 당신의 소중한 가족을 지켜드립니다. Attorney LEE protects your family, not only you
[한국변호사, 미국변호사(연방법원, 일리노이주), 세무사 이재욱]
조세소송, 조세불복심판, 세무자문, 민,형사,행정,국제소송, 한국이민, 미국이민, 한국투자, 미국투자, 국제거래, 국제중재, 미술품거래 서비스
[ENGLISH LANGUAGE SERVICE FOR FOREIGNERS]
ATTORNEY LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE [ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
TAX, LAW, IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT INTO KOREA AND U.S.A. SERVICES, ART DEALING SERVICES
[INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT, DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, CRIMINAL TRIAL, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, VISA, RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
국제거래,국제계약, 영문계약서, 중재,조정,ADR, Arbitration Court representation. Singapore, HK, LONDON, NY. BEIJing, LA -> BLOG[국제중재,국제재판,국제중재재판,국제거래,국제계약,국제조정, Korea Arbitrator LEE, jae wook Attorney at law(KOREA, U.S.A.)]
학교폭력,학생폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교성폭력, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 전문서비스 -> BLOG[학교폭력, 학생폭력,학교 성폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 서비스]
세무신고,불복심판,조세소송 전문서비스 -> BLOG[세무소송,조세소송]
고품격 이혼,상속분쟁, 재산권분쟁 소송 -> BLOG[ 이혼소송, 재산분할, 상속분쟁, 양육권, 친권, 위자료]
성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문서비스 -> BLOG[ 성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문변호사]
병역면제,국외여행허가,이중국적,병역법위반 사건 대리 -> BLOG[ 병역법, 병역면제, 해외유학 병역연기 전문소송 변호사 이재욱(한국변호사, 미국변호사, IL, FEDERAL)]
KOREA IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT SERVICES IN KOREA FOR FOREIGNERS -> BLOG[ Korea Visa & Immigration, Investment, Sojourn for Foreigners]
한국인을 위한 미국이민 대리서비스 -> BLOG[ Immigration to U.S.A. for KOREANS (한국인을 위한 미국 이민 대리 서비스)]
변호사 이재욱 저서 구매 사이트(TAX & LAW PRESS) -> 예스24 온라인판매

TAXNLAW.CO.KR

About Attorney| 민사
행정
| 세무
조세
| 부동산| 병역법위반소송
기소중지
병역면제
국외여행허가
| KOREA
INVESTMENT
VISA
Immigration
| 이혼
성희롱
성폭력
전문강사
| 예술과
법률
| U.S.A.
VISA
IMMIGRATION
| 파산
회생
| OFFICE| U.S.A.
VISA
APPLICATION
| Refuge
Asylum
| 미국법|
미국 이민,비자,영주권
미국이민뉴스
PRACTITION TIP
USCIS AFM(DHS)
9 FAM VISAS(DOS)
PERM (Labor Certification)
Consular Process(DOS)
DACA, DAPA
VAWA
legal english
AAO불복
연방법원항소
Immigration Court 항소
BIA항소
ICE 이민집행
CBP 세관 및 입출국관리
Removal 추방
PT
ICE 이민집행


CONSTITUTION ON ICE A Report on Immigration Home Raid Operations
jae wook LEE  (Homepage)
2016-07-05 11:07:22, 조회 : 380, 추천 : 103


CONSTITUTION ON ICE
A Report on Immigration Home Raid Operations



cardozo ImmIgratIon justice clInIc









Immigration justice Clinic
by
Bess Chiu
Lynly egyes
Peter L. Markowitz
Jaya Vasandani




this report was written by the immigration justice Clinic of the Benjamin n. Cardozo school of Law at Yeshiva university. the authors are Bess Chiu, Lynly egyes, Peter L. Markowitz, and Jaya Vasandani.

the authors wish to acknowledge the valuable insights, assistance, and technical expertise of: Professor Baher Azmy, Professor BassINA Farbenblum, Jeremy Watson and elyce Matthews of the seton Hall school of Law Center for Justice; sandra Dunn of the Hagedorn Foundation; Dan Kesselbrenner of the national immigration Project of the national Lawyers Guild; Professor Bruce Levin, Chair of the Department of Biostatistics at the Mailman school of Public Health at Columbia university; sergeant israel santiago of the nassau County police Department; Zsuzanna toth of Cardozo school of Law; and Professor Michael Wishnie of Yale Law school.

the Cardozo immigration justice Clinic also gratefully acknowledges the generous support for this report provided by the Hagedorn Foundation.


















© 2009 Cardozo Immigration justice Clinic, All Rights Reserved

no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Cardozo immigration justice Clinic. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from http://www.cardozo.yu.edu/immigrationjustice.

Requests for permission to reproduce excerpts of this report should be directed to: immigration justice Clinic, Cardozo school of Law, 55 Fifth Avenue, rm. 1109, new York, nY 10003.

suggested citation: Bess Chiu, Lynly egyes, Peter L. Markowitz, and Jaya Vasandani, Constitution on ICE:
A Report on Immigration Home Raid Operations, Cardozo immigration justice Clinic (new York, nY 2009).














ii b Constitution on iC e b Cardozo i mmigration justice Clinic



this report was prepared under the invaluable guidance of an advisory panel comprised of law enforcement professionals. the authors wish to thank the members of the advisory panel for their important contributions, particularly in assisting the authors to develop the policy recommendations contained herein. the members of the Law enforcement Advisory Panel are:


Commissioner Lawrence W. Mulvey, Commissioner of the nassau County police Department in new York. Commissioner Mulvey, who chaired the advisory panel, is a decorated veteran
with 28 years of policing experience who also formerly served as a security contractor to the
Department of Homeland security.


Chief George Gascón, Chief of police of the Mesa police Department in Arizona. Prior to his current appointment, Chief Gascón spent over 28 years with the Los Angeles police Department, rising to rank of Assistant police Chief and Director of the offICE of operations.


Professor Charles A. Lieberman, Ph.D., full-time lecturer in the Department of Law, police science and criminal justice Administration at John Jay College of criminal justice in new York. Prior to joining academia, Professor Lieberman served in the new York City police Department for 15 years.


Chairman Anthony Miranda, executive Chairman of the national Latino officers Association (nLoA). Prior to assuming leadership at nLoA, Chairman Miranda served in the new York City police Department.


Professor Christopher W. Ortiz, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of criminal justice and the Deputy Director of the Center for security and Disaster Response at the new York institute of technology. Professor ortiz is also a sergeant with the City of Glen Cove police Department and has served
as a senior Research Associate at the Center on immigration and justice at the Vera institute of
JustICE, new York, n.Y.


General Counsel Michael Ramage, General Counsel for the Florida Department of Law enforcement (FDLe). Mr. Ramage has served in his current capacity since 1992. Prior to joining the FDLe, Mr. Ramage served as a state prosecutor under then state Attorney Janet Reno.

















Constitution on iC e b Cardozo i mmigration justice Clinic b iii


Acknowledgements . . . . . ii

lAw enforcement Advisory PAnel . . . . . iii

executive summAry . . . .. . . . . . 1


i. introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

ii. overview of ICE Home rAids strAtegy . . . 5
ICE Home Raid operations . . . . . . . . 5
Constitutional Requirements for ICE Home Raids . . . . . 6
ICE Policies Governing Home Raids . . . . . . 6

iii. tHe PrevAlence of constitutionAl violAtions during ICE Home rAids: Assessing tHe evidence . . . . . . 9

empirical evidence . . . . . . . . . . 9

Data From ICE Arrest Records . . . . . . . . 9

Suppression Motion Data . 12

Law enforcement and Political Leaders Accounts of ICE Home Raids . . . . . . . . . 14
uniform national Pattern of Constitutional Violations During ICE Home Raids . . . . . . 16

iv. AnAlysis . . . . . 23

Potential Causes of ICE's Home Raid Misconduct . . . . . . . . . 23

ICE's 2006 Performance Policy . . . . . . . 23

Lack of Suppression Motions in Removal Proceedings . . . . . 24

Barriers to Civil Remedies . . . . . . 25

Management and Oversight Failures by ICE. . 25
impact of ICE Home Misconduct on Local Law enforcement and Public safety . 26

v. Policy recommendAtions . . . . . . . . 27





During the last two years of the Bush Administration,

the u.s. immigration and Customs enforcement agency (iCe) vastly expanded its use of home raid operations
        a) as a method to locate and apprehend individuals
                i) suspected of civil immigration law violations.

These home raids generally involve teams of heavily armed ICE agents
        a) making pre-dawn tactical entries into homes,
                i) purportedly to apprehend some high priority target
                        A) believed to be residing therein.

ICE has admitted
        a that these are warrantless raids and,
        b) therefore, that any entries into homes require the informed consent of residents.

However,

frequent accounts
        a) in the media and
        b) in legal filings

1) have told a similar story
        a) of constitutional violations
                i) occurring during ICE home raids —
        b) a story
                i) that includes ICE agents
                        A) breaking into homes and
                        B) seizing all occupants without legal basis.

This report is the first public effort
        a) to compile and
        b) analyze the available evidence
                i) regarding the prevalence of constitutional violations
                        A) occurring during ICE home raids.

Through two Freedom of information Act lawsuits,

1) the authors of this report obtained significant samples
        a) of ICE arrest records
                i) from home raid operations
                ii) in new York and new Jersey.

Analysis of these records,
        a) together with other publicly available documents,

1) reveals an established pattern of misconduct
        a) by ICE agents
        b) in the new York and new Jersey Field offices.

Further, the evidence suggests that
        a) such pattern may be a widespread national phenomenon
                i) reaching beyond these local offices.

The pattern of misconduct involves:


• ICE agents
        a) illegally entering homes without legal authority –
                i) for example,
                        A) physically pushing or
                        B) breaking their way into private residences.


• ICE agents
        a) illegally seizing non-target individuals
                i) during home raid operations –
                ii) for example,
                        A) seizing innocent people
                                I) in their bedrooms
                                II) without any basis.


• ICE agents
        a) illegally searching homes
                i) without legal authority –
                ii) for example,
                        A) breaking down locked doors inside homes.


• ICE agents
        a) illegally seizing individuals
                i) based solely
                        A) on racial or ethnic appearance or
                        B) on limited english proficiency.


The report analyzes the variety of factors
        a) that have contributed to this pattern
                i) of ICE misconduct
                ii) including:

                a. 2006 changes in ICE performance expectations;
                b. the INAbility of
                        A) suppression motions or
                        B) civil lawsuits
                                I) to serve as a meaningful deterrent to ICE misconduct; and
                c. serious management and oversight failures
                        A) by ICE supervisors.

In order
        a) to correct course and
        b) to improve the ability
                i) of ICE
                ii) to carry out its mission,

1) we propose several policy recommendations
        a) aimed at:

        a. setting appropriate limits
                i) on the use of home raids;
        b. revising ICE's warrant & consent practices;
        c. improving supervision and training
                i) of ICE home raid teams;
        d. minimizing harm to local community policing efforts;
        e. minimizing the intrusion
                i) to non-targets
                        A) encountered during ICE home raids; and
        f. improving accountability
                i) for ICE agents and supervisors
                        A) involved in illegal home raids.

our key recommendations include,
        a) among others:


        a. ICE should use home raids
                i) as a tactic of last resort, and
                ii) then, only to make criminal arrests or civil arrests
                        A) for targets
                                I) who pose a real risk to national security or
                                II) who have violent criminal records.


        b. ICE should obtain judicial warrants
                i) in advance
                        A) of any home raid.


        c. ICE should require a high level supervisor
                i) to be on site for any home raid.


        d. ICE should videotape home raids.


        e. ICE should issue clear guidance
                i) that the sole objective
                        A) of a home raid

                    is to apprehend the target —

                1) agents should not generally question non-targets
                        A) encountered
                        B) about matters
                                I) other than the location of the target.


        f. the department of Homeland security’s (dHs)
                i) OffICE of the Inspector General (OIG)

           should undertake an investigation
                i) of the pattern
                        A) of misconduct
                        B) established in this report
                b) to better assess the national scope of the problem.


        g.         a) DHS and/or
                b) the department of justice

                   should enact regulations
                        A) disallowing the use of evidence
                                I) in immigration removal proceedings

                1) when such evidence has been obtained
                        A) through violation of the Constitution.




The u.s. immigration and Customs enforcement agency
        a) (ICE or “the Agency”)
        b) of the Department of Homeland security
                i) (DHs or “the Department”),
                ii) created in 2003,

1) is primarily responsible for the enforcement
        a) of immigration laws
        b) in the interior of the united states.1

ICE has historically used a number of strategies
        a) to locate and apprehend persons
                i) suspected of violating
                        A) civil and
                        B) criminal
                                I) provisions of the immigration and nationality Act 2 (INA).

Such strategies include, among others,
        a) coordINAting with local criminal justice systems
                i) to identify deportable immigrants
                        A) who have been arrested on criminal charges,
        b) coordINAting with The United States Citizenship and immigration services agency
                i) to identify deportable immigrants
                        A) who have applied for some form of immigration benefit, and
        c) conducting traditional criminal investigations
                i) of persons
                        A) suspected of violating the criminal provisions
                                I) of the INA.

During the last two years of the Bush Administration,

ICE substantially increased its use
        a) of one particular enforcement tactic:

        a. high profile swat-style raids
                i) on homes and workplaces
                ii) targeting civil immigration violators.3

Much has been written
        a) on the phenomenon of workplace raids and

1) ICE has, in fact, recently revised its guidelines
        a) for such raids.4

However,

relatively little public scrutiny has been focused
        a) on the related phenomena of ICE home raids.

This report seeks to begin filling that void.

Starting in 2006,

a growing body of evidence has arisen         
        a) which suggests that many ICE agents have failed to routinely observe constitutional requirements
                i)in carrying out ICE home raid operations.

        a) Citizens and
        b) non-citizens
                i) alike

1) are protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition
        a) against unreasonable searches and seizures.5

However, frequent accounts in the media and in legal filings have told a similar story of Fourth Amendment violations occurring during ICE home raids. From these accounts, the picture that emerges of a typical home raid depicts a team of heavily armed ICE agents approaching a private residence in the pre-dawn hours, purportedly seeking an individual target believed to have committed some civil immigration violation. Agents, armed only with administrative warrants, which do not grant them legal authority to enter private dwellings, then push their way in when residents answer the door, enter through unlocked doors or windows or, in some cases, physically break into homes. once inside, agents immediately seize and interrogate all occupants, often in excess of their legal authority and even after they have located and apprehended their target — though in the large majority of cases, no target is apprehended. While these abuses are by no means universal, accounts of such behavior have occurred with sufficient frequency to warrant this inquiry.



This report is the first public document to collect and analyze the available evidence regarding the prevalence of constitutional violations occurring during ICE home raids. In addition to assessing the home raid incidents discussed in various news accounts and legal filings, this report relies upon the special perspective of local law enforcement and political leaders, and for the first time examines ICE's own records for empirical evidence of the prevalence of violations occurring during ICE home raids.

Section ii presents a practical and legal overview of ICE's home raid strategy. section iii compiles and analyzes evidence regarding the prevalence of constitutional violations occurring during ICE home raids. section iV analyzes the causes and costs of the problems with ICE's home raid strategy. FINAlly, section V sets forth a series of policy recommendations designed to curb the widespread constitutional violations occurring during ICE home raids. these policy proposals were developed, in large part, in collaboration with a Law enforcement Advisory Panel assembled for this report. the Advisory Panel, chaired by nassau County police Commissioner Lawrence W. Mulvey, is comprised of law enforcement leaders and scholars from across the united states. the Advisory Panel played a critical role in reviewing the report findings and in developing these specific policy proposals for ICE to ensure that its officers comply with constitutional requirements when conducting home raids.





Within ICE, there are two major divisions that carry out its interior immigration enforcement mandate: the offICE of Detention and Removal (DRo), which primarily seeks to identify and arrest immigrants for civil immigration violations, and the office
of investigations (oi), primarily a criminal investigative division of ICE,6 tasked with investigating national security threats, financialand smuggling violations, gang offenses, commercial fraud, and other immigration violations.7 Both DRo and oi regularly use home raids.


ICE HOMe RAId OPeRAtIOns

several DRo and oi operations have, since 2006, come to rely heavily on home raids as a primary tactic. these operations include, among others, the national Fugitive operations Program (nFoP), targeting individuals with orders of deportation; operation Cross Check, encompassing enforcement efforts that target specific immigrant populations, such as immigrants from certain countries or immigrants working in certain industries;8 operation Community shield, targeting immigrant gang members; and operation Predator, targeting immigrant sex offenders. Despite
these operations’ purported focus on high priority
targets, the evidence demonstrates that the large majority of arrests made in home raids carried out under these operations are not of high priority targets but rather are collateral arrests of mere civil immigration status violators.9

ICE's nFoP is worthy of further explanation because of its size and because of the publicity its home raid operations have garnered. ICE created the nFoP, within DRo, in 2003.10 nFoP uses seven-person Fugitive operations teams (Fots) to carry out the Program’s mission. the stated purpose of these teams is to expand the agency’s efforts to locate,
arrest and remove immigrants with old orders of deportation,11 while giving priority to cases involving immigrants who pose a threat to national security and to the community. in 2006, ICE instituted several dramatic policy changes related to its Fots which, collectively, help explain ICE's increased reliance on home raid operations and the constitutional violations occurring during such operations. the policy changes inflated the arrest expectations for Fots eight-fold, while simultaneously removing a requirement that Fots focus on “criminal aliens,” and for the first time permitting Fots to count collateral arrests of civil status violators toward their inflated arrest expectations. the impact of ICE's 2006 revised performance expectations is discussed in detail later in this report.12 over the course of time, the number of Fots increased as well; while the nFoP started with eight Fots, today there are over 100 teams.13 Given the size of the nFoP and its primary reliance upon home raids, the behavior of Fots are of particular importance in assessing ICE's home raid strategy.




http://taxnlaw.co.kr/

  추천하기   [HOME]  [bitly]  [반전해제]  목록보기

Copyright 1999-2018 Zeroboard / skin by zero
일부 항목은 회원가입후 login하셔야 글을 읽고 쓰실 수 있습니다.
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.

세금과 법률
세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)
변호사 이재욱(한국, 미국)
우)06653
서울특별시 서초구 서초동 1589-5 센츄리1 오피스텔 412호
서울특별시 서초구 반포대로14길 30 (센츄리오피스텔) 412호.
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653

email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
연락전화: +82-010-6350-1799 / 미국전화: +1-323-553-1799

세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민
(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)

TAX & LAW, ART DEALING, IMMIGRATION
ATTORNEY AT LAW(KOREA, USA, ILLINOIS)
KOREA CELL: +82-010-6350-1799 / U.S.A., CELL: +1-323-553-1799
email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
우)06653
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653