법률사무소 세금과 법률 taxnlaw.co.kr
ID PW
TAX & LAW <세금과 법률> 당신과 당신의 소중한 가족을 지켜드립니다. Attorney LEE protects your family, not only you
[한국변호사, 미국변호사(연방법원, 일리노이주), 세무사 이재욱]
조세소송, 조세불복심판, 세무자문, 민,형사,행정,국제소송, 한국이민, 미국이민, 한국투자, 미국투자, 국제거래, 국제중재, 미술품거래 서비스
[ENGLISH LANGUAGE SERVICE FOR FOREIGNERS]
ATTORNEY LEE, JAE WOOK'S OFFICE [ LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN KOREA, U.S.A., ILLINOIS ]
TAX, LAW, IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT INTO KOREA AND U.S.A. SERVICES, ART DEALING SERVICES
[INVESTMENT, TAX, INCORPORATION, TRADE, CONTRACT, DISPUTE IN CORPORATION, LITIGATION & TRIAL IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, CRIMINAL TRIAL, GOVERNMENT TREATMENT, REFUGEE, VISA, RESIDENCE, CITIZENSHIP]
국제거래,국제계약, 영문계약서, 중재,조정,ADR, Arbitration Court representation. Singapore, HK, LONDON, NY. BEIJing, LA -> BLOG[국제중재,국제재판,국제중재재판,국제거래,국제계약,국제조정, Korea Arbitrator LEE, jae wook Attorney at law(KOREA, U.S.A.)]
학교폭력,학생폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교성폭력, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 전문서비스 -> BLOG[학교폭력, 학생폭력,학교 성폭력, 학생 성폭행, 학교폭력대책자치위원회 서비스]
세무신고,불복심판,조세소송 전문서비스 -> BLOG[세무소송,조세소송]
고품격 이혼,상속분쟁, 재산권분쟁 소송 -> BLOG[ 이혼소송, 재산분할, 상속분쟁, 양육권, 친권, 위자료]
성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문서비스 -> BLOG[ 성희롱, 성폭력, 성범죄, 성매매, 학교폭력 가해자, 피해자를 위한 전문변호사]
병역면제,국외여행허가,이중국적,병역법위반 사건 대리 -> BLOG[ 병역법, 병역면제, 해외유학 병역연기 전문소송 변호사 이재욱(한국변호사, 미국변호사, IL, FEDERAL)]
KOREA IMMIGRATION & INVESTMENT SERVICES IN KOREA FOR FOREIGNERS -> BLOG[ Korea Visa & Immigration, Investment, Sojourn for Foreigners]
한국인을 위한 미국이민 대리서비스 -> BLOG[ Immigration to U.S.A. for KOREANS (한국인을 위한 미국 이민 대리 서비스)]
변호사 이재욱 저서 구매 사이트(TAX & LAW PRESS) -> 예스24 온라인판매

TAXNLAW.CO.KR

About Attorney| 민사
행정
| 세무
조세
| 부동산| 병역법위반소송
기소중지
병역면제
국외여행허가
| KOREA
INVESTMENT
VISA
Immigration
| 이혼
성희롱
성폭력
전문강사
| 예술과
법률
| U.S.A.
VISA
IMMIGRATION
| 파산
회생
| OFFICE| U.S.A.
VISA
APPLICATION
| Refuge
Asylum
| 미국법|
REFUGE, ASYLUM IN KOREA
REMOVAL, DEPORTATION
ADMISSION INSPECTION INTO KOREA
REFUGE, ASYLUM IN KOREA


In-Canada refugee claims: Grounds for ineligibility
2018-07-05 13:32:46, 조회 : 37, 추천 : 5
In-Canada refugee claims: Grounds for ineligibility
This section contains policy, procedures and guidance used by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada staff. It is posted on the Department’s website as a courtesy to stakeholders.

A claim is not eligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) if the claimant is described in any of the paragraphs of the Act described in this table:

Ineligibility
section in IRPA
Meaning
A101(1)(a)
A person who has already become a protected person in Canada is not eligible to make a refugee claim, as they already enjoy refugee protection in Canada. This includes a person who:
became a protected person through resettlement [A95(1)(a)],
was found to be a refugee by the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) [A95(1)(b)]
had a positive pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) [A95(1)(c)].
A101(1)(b)
This provision prevents a person from making multiple refugee claims, whether their previous claim was made under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) or previous immigration legislation [R339]. This includes claims that were vacated or ceased by the RPD (or the Convention Refugee Determination Division under the former Act); and claims that were rejected by the Minister under the former Act.

Note: a claimant who was refused resettlement at a Canadian visa office is not ineligible under A101(1)(b), as their refugee protection concerns were not heard by the IRB.
A101(1)(c)
A person with previous ineligible claims or with a claim that was determined by the RPD to have been withdrawn or abandoned is barred from a subsequent referral to the RPD, even if the circumstances with respect to their ineligibility have changed.
If the person left Canada and six months or more have passed since their departure, the person may be entitled to apply for a PRRA.
A101(1)(d)
A person who has been recognized as a Convention refugee by a country other than Canada, and can be returned to that country, is not eligible for determination by the RPD.
The words "can be returned to that country" refer to whether that jurisdiction will readmit the person. If the country will not re-admit the claimant, then A101(1)(d) does not apply.
To determine if A101(1)(d) applies there is a two part test and both parts must be met:
Has the claimant been recognized as a Convention refugee by a country other than Canada?; and
Can the claimant return to that country?
The 101(1)(d) does not apply to persons who have become citizens of the country that recognized them as Convention refugees.
The officer must be satisfied that the person in question has been recognized as a refugee under the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocol (PDF, 30 KB). Persons may be in possession of an identity or travel document stating that they had been granted refugee protection in the issuing country. The person’s status may also be confirmed by the person’s own statements. Some countries grant protection from refoulement or deportation on grounds that are not related to the requirements of the refugee Convention. An example of this would be protection pursuant to Article 3 of the Convention against Torture, which is not the same as protection under the 1951 Convention.
  
If the country that granted protection has not signed either the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocoll (30 KB), the claim may be determined eligible for referral to the RPD.
If a person who has been recognized as a Convention refugee states that the concerned country will not re-admit them, the officer must confirm this with officials of that country.
Persons who have “Withholding of Removal” status in the United States (U.S.) are considered to have been recognized as Convention refugees for the purposes of paragraph 101(1)(d). However, not all persons with this status are readmitted to the U.S. once they have left. The officer must confirm with officials that the person will be readmitted.
A person whose claim is determined ineligible under A101(1)(d) may be entitled to a risk assessment under A115(1).
A101(1)(e)
The Agreement between Canada and the United States of America for Cooperation in the Examination of Refugee Status Claims by Nationals of Third Countries is commonly known as the as the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) or ‘Agreement.’

The U.S. is the only country that has been designated by the regulations as a safe third country, under R159.3.
A claimant who arrives at a land border Port of Entry from the U.S. may not be eligible for referral to the IRB under A101(1)(e).
There are exemptions and exceptions to the STCA that permit some claimants to make a refugee claim in Canada even if they did come from the U.S. For more information on the STCA, refer to R159.1 to R159.7 and Procedures on the Safe Third Country Agreement.
A101(1)(f)
Under the terms of the 1951 Convention, a country need not provide protection if the claimant poses a danger to security, violated human or international rights, or committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to their admission to that country as a refugee.
While a person found inadmissible on grounds of participation in organized crime is ineligible, the provisions defining organized crime ensure that a person who has merely used the services of such organizations to come to Canada (e.g., used a people smuggler), remain eligible to have their claim referred to the RPD.
When a person appears to be inadmissible under A34, A35, A36(1)(b) or A37, the officer cannot determine eligibility until the person’s admissibility has been determined conclusively by the Immigration Division of the IRB. If this admissibility hearing will not be concluded prior to expiration of the 3-working-day timeframe, the officer must suspend consideration of eligibility [A100(2)].
A refugee claim is ineligible if:
the claimant is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality due to a conviction in Canada which is punishable by at least 10 years (irrespective of the prison sentence they received [if any]);
the claimant is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality due to a conviction outside Canada that would be punishable by at least 10 years if committed in Canada (there is no need to seek a danger opinion).
When a claimant appears to be inadmissible for serious criminality, prepare an A44 report, refer it to the Immigration Division, and suspend the consideration of eligibility as per A100(2). If/when the client is determined to be inadmissible, the officer determines the person’s claim ineligible.
Persons whose refugee claims are ineligible under A101(1)(f) will normally be entitled to a PRRA (Applicants described in subsection A112(3)).
See also Procedures on refugee claim suspension.
A101(2)(a)
Refugee claims of persons inadmissible due to convictions in Canada are ineligible only if the offence is punishable by a maximum prison term of at least 10 years.
A101(2)(b)
Refugee claims of persons inadmissible due to convictions outside Canada are ineligible only if the conviction is for an offence that, if committed in Canada, would constitute an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum prison term of 10 years or more.



http://taxnlaw.co.kr/

  추천하기   [HOME]  [bitly]  [반전해제]  목록보기

Copyright 1999-2018 Zeroboard / skin by zero
일부 항목은 회원가입후 login하셔야 글을 읽고 쓰실 수 있습니다.
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.

세금과 법률
세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)
변호사 이재욱(한국, 미국)
우)06653
서울특별시 서초구 서초동 1589-5 센츄리1 오피스텔 412호
서울특별시 서초구 반포대로14길 30 (센츄리오피스텔) 412호.
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653

email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
연락전화: +82-010-6350-1799 / 미국전화: +1-323-553-1799

세금과 법률, 부동산경매, 토지수용, 이민
(TAX & LAW, REAL ESTATE, IMMIGRATION)

TAX & LAW, ART DEALING, IMMIGRATION
ATTORNEY AT LAW(KOREA, USA, ILLINOIS)
KOREA CELL: +82-010-6350-1799 / U.S.A., CELL: +1-323-553-1799
email: jawala.lee@gmail.com
우)06653
Suite 412, Banpo-daero 14-gil 30, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06653