[TAX & LAW] 변호사(KO, USA, IL) 이재욱

[Title]
Removal Proceedings Process

Start →

Removal Proceedings Process

The Executive Office for Immigration Review,
        a) an agency of the Department of Justice,

1) oversees three components
        a) that adjudicate matters
                i) involving immigration law
                ii) at both
                        A) the trial and
                        B) appellate level.

The Executive Office for Immigration Review
        a) immigration judges

1) hold evidentiary removal hearings
        a) to determine
                i) whether certain aliens are removable from the United States.

When a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enforcement official determines
        a) that
                i) a person is in the United States illegally and
                ii) the alleged illegal alien denies that allegation,

1) the official serves the alleged illegal alien
        a) with a Notice to Appear.

The Notice to Appear is a “charging document”
        a) that
                i) initiates formal removal proceedings and
                ii) can be served either
                        A) in person or
                        B) through the mail.

Once this document has been issued,

DHS is not permitted
        a) to remove the alleged illegal alien
                i) from the United States.

Generally,

a Notice to Appear includes the date, time, and place
        a) of the removal hearing,

1) although sometimes it will indicate that
        a) a future document will provide the date, time, and place of the hearing.

DHS also files these notices
        a) with the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

At the hearings,

attorneys
        a) from United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s
                i) Office of Principal Legal Advisor

1) present evidence
        a) that the alleged illegal alien,
                i) or “respondent,”

         is removable.

The immigration judge makes two determinations:

        1. Whether the alleged illegal alien is removable.

                For example,

                when an immigration judge determines
                        A) that the respondent is a United States citizen,

                1) he or she would not be removable.

        2. When the respondent is deemed
                i) to be removable,

                1) then the immigration judge determines
                        A) whether the alien is entitled to any relief from removal.

                The most common forms
                        A) of relief

                1) are
                        A) adjustment of status
                                I) to that of a lawful permanent resident,
                        B) asylum, and
                        C) cancellation of removal.

The immigration judge makes the decision
        a) during a recorded proceeding.

When the judge finds against the respondent,

1) he or she is issued a final order of removal.

When the respondent fails to appear at the hearing,

1) the DHS attorney presents evidence
        a) to the immigration judge
        b) that the respondent is removable.

Based on the evidence,

1) the immigration judges issues an in absentia order.

The result
        a) of the in absentia hearing

1) is mailed to the respondent.

When an immigration judge’s decision is against the respondent,

1) the respondent can appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Likewise,

when the immigration judge’s decision is in favor of the respondent,

1) the government may appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

The Board’s decisions are subject to review
        a) by the federal courts.

Aliens
        a) who have been issued a final order of removal

1) are required to leave the country.

* jae wook LEE님에 의해서 게시물 복사되었습니다 (2016-07-05 09:10)

← End

[Title]
Removal Proceedings Process

by Attorney LEE(Tax & Law)
↑ Scroll To Top ↑

Copyright 1997-2021 TAX & LAW (세금과 법률)
본 site의 정보는 영리를 목적으로 제공하는 것이 아니며, 이곳에 등재된 모든 글은 "공개"된 대법원판례(온라인이 아니라 대법원이 종이책으로 출간한 대법원 법원공보상의 판례집)에 기한 것으로 실명과 무관합니다.
따라서, 이 곳에 기재된 대법원 판례에 혹시라도 귀하의 성명과 인적사항이 있다면, 그것은 귀하의 것이 아니며, 귀하와 동명이인이거나 가상의 인적사항이라는 점에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
그럼에도 불구하고 이를 귀하의 인적사항이라고 주장하신다면, 귀하는 본 사이트가 아니라 대법원에 그러한 점을 적시하여 공개된 (종이책으로 출간된 대법원 법원공보상의 판례집) 판례의 내용을 전부 직접 수정을 해줄 것을 스스로 주장하십시요. 본 사무실에 연락하실 부분이 아닙니다.

[한국변호사, 미국변호사, 일리노이 변호사, 세무사 이재욱]

Start →

← End